If one were to find the aforementioned scene even slightly unsettling, they would be best served skipping this film. The scenes of extreme violence were simply too many to record, and each one had a very, very dark and unsettling tone, somewhat odd for a genre that never seems to quite have a grip on reality. This is only one of many truly unsettling violent segments. One such scene found an infected man slashing his wife, eventually forcing his thumbs into her eye sockets, which in turn killed her.
![watch 28 weeks later watch 28 weeks later](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/pv-target-images/5ea4baddcad29300faaf69f5f151574c2c5541477e4750ff604fe3fb2cc0ae11._SX1080_.png)
The violence was sickening in its brutality. While the other films had a clear break with reality, “28 Weeks Later” did not. I have reviewed more than one truly disgusting film, but this was by far the most unsettling. It is difficult to explain exactly how horribly disgusting this film actually is. In terms of content, the most obvious concern of this film will be the violence, and I suggest that any readers easily sickened skip to the next paragraph. The American Army has arrived to help with the relief efforts, and all seems to be going well… that is, until the virus resurfaces.
![watch 28 weeks later watch 28 weeks later](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/xBcAAOSwY45UUoXs/s-l400.jpg)
This installment takes place 28 weeks after the first occurrence of infection, just as society is beginning to return to normal, all the infected are dead from starvation, and refugees are slowly but surely arriving in Britain. For those unfamiliar with the previous film, “ 28 Days Later” put a spin on the zombie genre in which a group of infected humans spread their highly contagious virus to other humans causing them to have uncontrollable, indefinite fits of rage in which they kill all human beings. “28 Weeks Later” is the follow-up to the extremely popular independent film “ 28 Days Later”.